So, I'm a little behind the times.
But
on YouTube is a trailer for a movie entitled "Sherlock Holmes", with Robert Downey Jr. as Holmes and Jude Law as Watson. I'm actually more excited about Watson than Holmes, really, because I didn't know much about Downey until Ironman, and I'm still waiting on rumors of a sequel to that movie (see last five minutes of The Incredible Hulk - you know, the reboot that's got Eric Bana and isn't the sucky less-than-newish Hulk movie). But I basically saw this and went, "Why's Tony Stark dressed in a vest?" and the rest of the
offical trailer , which is identical to the one I first linked except for the last thirty seconds or so (I found that particular section really raunchy, beware) only sort of solidified my "hey it's Tony Stark the womanizer" impression. My overall feelings on this?
Well, one is the overturning of my conception of Holmes, which was always more cerebral than physical - his history as a boxer was always overshadowed in my mind by the violin-playing, and the chess, and the lamentable cocaine addiction. Marksmanship never struck me as - well, as brutally active as the massive swinging sledgehammers displayed. I think Hollywood is going to blink and nicely miss the drugs, though.
My second feeling is sortof, "Oh, another THE WORLD IS ENDING!!! story. *yawn* I hope the next Star Trek movie is more in the vein of the original series, about the weird and good (but not always life-in-peril-must-save-de-wurld) mission to seek out new life and new civilization. Oh, right, I was talking about the Holmes movie . . . they're saving the world AGAIN?" I never would have thought it, but honestly? Saving the world is becoming a trite storyline. Um, what was up with that chick with the white eyes and the floaty-ness? (there's a voice in the back of my head screaming OMG LILITH!! Quite possibly I have had too much SPN. Heh. Nevermind. There is no such thing. BTW, my TV Guide says that tomorrow's a rerun of "Sympathy for the Devil", 5.01. Anyone else experiencing this confuzzling phenomenon?)
Overall, I'm going to take this new Sherlock Holmes movie (release date: Christmas Day) with a grain of salt, and read the snarky comments by the British on YouTube about the trailer and how Americans have never fully grasped the "British mindset". If by that you mean socialism and teatime, I will say that no, we haven't - current administration aside re: the former, and my own personal enjoyment aside re: the latter. But I will reference all the disgruntled Englishmen to this date in history:
December 16, 1773 and hazard that it might be part of the explanation why. No, seriously, they are very snarky. They're completely entitled, of course, Sherlock Holmes is _theirs_ and Hollywood is out for attracting audiences with action and explosions. I don't anticipate, unless the movie's more of a mystery than an actual mystical WE BRING THE APOCALYPSE thing, true to the spirit of the actual Holmes, that it'll do well internationally. I'd be more interested to see the response in the UK than anything else, really.
In a totally unrelated vein - two books I would like to see
accurately put to film?
From the Mixed-Up Files of Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler and
The Giver. Just because I love them both and if really good directors and writers, dedicated to the heart of these stories, do them? They could be
fantastic. And eventually someone's got to go back and reboot
The Dark Is Rising from the miserable disgrace that claimed some of its plot. Barbarians. What would I have to do to get the job where I decide what books are made into movies, and by whom? That would be a frigging
awesome job. I could make them fix TDIR, for one. No one would recognize it. Is it too much to ask for an actor who can act
and sing? And also happens to be about eleven? And male, and actually
English? But I won't bore you with my (unending) list of complaints re: that movie whose name shall not be spoken but purported to be "based on" (blasphemers) TDIR.
Tootles!